Your browser does not support JavaScript! before use docindia please enable Javascript on your browser


Rx only


DESCRIPTION


CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY

 

Dose†(CefuroximeEquivalent)Peak PlasmaConcentration(mcg/mL)Time of PeakPlasmaConcentration (hr)MeanEliminationHalf-Life (hr)AUC(mcg•hr mL)
125 mg2.12.21.26.7
250 mg4.12.51.212.9
500 mg7.03.01.227.4
1,000 mg13.62.51.350.0
MIC (mcg/mL)Interpretation
≤ 4(S) Susceptible
8 to16(I) Intermediate
≥32(R) Resistant
MicroorganismMIC (mcg/mL)
Escherichia coli ATCC 259222 to 8
Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 292130.5 to 2
Zone Diameter (mm)Interpretation
≥ 23(S) Susceptible
15 to 22(I) Intermediate
≤14(R) Resistant
MicroorganismZone Diameter (mm)
Escherichia coli ATCC 2592220 to 26
Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 2592327 to 35

INDICATIONS & USAGE


CONTRAINDICATIONS


WARNINGS


PRECAUTIONS


ADVERSE REACTIONS

CEFUROXIME AXETIL TABLETS IN CLINICAL TRIALS:Multiple-Dose Dosing Regimens: 7 to 10 Days Dosing: Using multiple doses of cefuroxime axetil tablets, 912 patients were treated with cefuroxime axetil (125 to 500 mg twice daily). There were no deaths or permanent disabilities thought related to drug toxicity. Twenty (2.2%) patients discontinued medication due to adverse events thought by the investigators to be possibly, probably, or almost certainly related to drug toxicity. Seventeen (85%) of the 20 patients who discontinued therapy did so because of gastrointestinal disturbances, including diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain. The percentage of cefuroxime axetil tablet-treated patients who discontinued study drug because of adverse events was very similar at daily doses of 1,000, 500, and 250 mg (2.3%, 2.1%, and 2.2%, respectively). However, the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events increased with the higher recommended doses.

The following adverse events were thought by the investigators to be possibly, probably, or almost certainly related to cefuroxime axetil tablets in multiple-dose clinical trials (n = 912 cefuroxime axetil-treated patients).

 

Table 2. Adverse Reactions – Cefuroxime Axetil Tablets

Multiple-Dose Dosing Regimens—Clinical Trials

 

5-Day Experience (see CLINICAL STUDIESsection): In clinical trials using cefuroxime axetil in a dose of 250 mg twice daily in the treatment of secondary bacterial infections of acute bronchitis, 399 patients were treated for 5 days and 402 patients were treated for 10 days. No difference in the occurrence of adverse events was found between the 2 regimens.

In Clinical Trials for Early Lyme Disease With 20 Days Dosing: Two multicenter trials assessed cefuroxime axetil tablets 500 mg twice a day for 20 days. The most common drug-related adverse experiences were diarrhea (10.6% of patients), Jarisch-Herxheimer reaction (5.6%), and vaginitis (5.4%). Other adverse experiences occurred with frequencies comparable to those reported with 7 to 10 days dosing.

Single-Dose Regimen for Uncomplicated Gonorrhea: In clinical trials using a single dose of cefuroxime axetil tablets, 1,061 patients were treated with the recommended dosage of cefuroxime axetil (1,000 mg) for the treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhea. There were no deaths or permanent disabilities thought related to drug toxicity in these studies.

The following adverse events were thought by the investigators to be possibly, probably, or almost certainly related to cefuroxime axetil in 1,000 mg single-dose clinical trials of cefuroxime axetil tablets in the treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhea conducted in the United States.

 

Table 3. Adverse Reactions–Cefuroxime Axetil Tablets

1 g Single-Dose Regimen for Uncomplicated Gonorrhea–Clinical Trials

 

POSTMARKETING EXPERIENCE WITH CEFUROXIME AXETIL PRODUCTS

In addition to adverse events reported during clinical trials, the following events have been identified during clinical practice in patients treated with cefuroxime axetil tablets or with cefuroxime axetil for oral suspension and were reported spontaneously. Data are generally insufficient to allow an estimate of incidence or to establish causation.

General: The following hypersensitivity reactions have been reported: anaphylaxis, angioedema, pruritus, rash, serum sickness-like reaction, urticaria.

Gastrointestinal: Pseudomembranous colitis (see WARNINGS).

Hematologic: Hemolytic anemia, leukopenia, pancytopenia, thrombocytopenia, and increased prothrombin time.

Hepatic: Hepatic impairment including hepatitis and cholestasis, jaundice.

Neurologic: Seizure.

Skin: Erythema multiforme, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis.

Urologic: Renal dysfunction.

 

CEPHALOSPORIN-CLASS ADVERSE REACTIONS:

In addition to the adverse reactions listed above that have been observed in patients treated with cefuroxime axetil, the following adverse reactions and altered laboratory tests have been reported for cephalosporin-class antibiotics: toxic nephropathy, aplastic anemia, hemorrhage, increased BUN, increased creatinine, false-positive test for urinary glucose, increased alkaline phosphatase, neutropenia, elevated bilirubin, and agranulocytosis.

Several cephalosporins have been implicated in triggering seizures, particularly in patients with renal impairment when the dosage was not reduced (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATIONand OVERDOSAGE). If seizures associated with drug therapy occur, the drug should be discontinued. Anticonvulsant therapy can be given if clin­ically indicated.

 Incidence ≥1% Diarrhea/loose stools  Nausea/vomiting  Transient elevation in AST  Transient elevation in ALT  Eosinophilia  Transient elevation in LDH 3.7%3.0%2.0%1.6%1.1%1.0%
 Incidence <1% but >0.1% Abdominal pain  Abdominal cramps  Flatulence  Indigestion  Headache  Vaginitis  Vulvar itch  Rash  Hives  Itch  Dysuria  Chills  Chest pain  Shortness of breath  Mouth ulcers  Swollen tongue Sleepiness Thirst Anorexia  Positive Coombs test 
 Incidence ≥1%  Nausea/vomiting  Diarrhea 6.8% 4.2%
 Incidence <1% but >0.1%  Abdominal pain  Dyspepsia  Erythema  Rash  Pruritus Vaginal candidiasis  Vaginal itch  Vaginal discharge  Headache  Dizziness  Somnolence  Muscle cramps  Muscle stiffness  Muscle spasm of neck  Tightness/pain in chest  Bleeding/pain in urethra  Kidney pain  Tachycardia  Lockjaw-type reaction 

OVERDOSAGE


DOSAGE & ADMINISTRATION

NOTE: CEFUROXIME AXETIL TABLETS AND CEFUROXIME AXETIL FOR ORAL SUSPENSION ARE NOT BIO­EQUIVALENT AND ARE NOT SUBSTITUTABLE ON A MILLIGRAM-PER-MILLIGRAM BASIS (SEE CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY).

 

 

 

Adolescents and Adults (13 years and older)
Pharyngitis/tonsillitis250 mg b.i.d.10
Acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis250 mg b.i.d.10
Acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis250 or 500 mg b.i.d.10*
Secondary bacterial infections of acute bronchitis250 or 500 mg b.i.d.5-10
Uncomplicated skin and skin­ structure infections250 or 500 mg b.i.d.10
Uncomplicated urinary tract infections250 mg b.i.d.7-10
Uncomplicated gonorrhea1,000 mg oncesingle dose
Early Lyme disease500 mg b.i.d.20
Pediatric Patients (who can swallow tablets whole)
Acute otitis media250 mg b.i.d.10
Acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis250 mg b.i.d.10

HOW SUPPLIED


CLINICAL STUDIES

Cefuroxime Axetil Tablets: Acute Bacterial Maxillary Sinusitis: One adequate and well-controlled study was performed in patients with acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis. In this study each patient had a maxillary sinus aspirate collected by sinus puncture before treatment was initiated for presumptive acute bacterial sinusitis. All patients had to have radiographic and clinical evidence of acute maxillary sinusitis. As shown in the following summary of the study, the general clinical effectiveness of cefuroxime axetil tablets was comparable to an oral antimicrobial agent that contained a specific beta­lactamase inhibitor in treating acute maxillary sinusitis. However, sufficient micro­biology data were obtained to demonstrate the effectiveness of cefuroxime axetil tablets in treating acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis due only to Streptococcus pneumoniae or non-beta-lactamase–producing Haemophilus influenzae. An insufficient number of beta-lactamase–producing Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis isolates were obtained in this trial to adequately evaluate the effectiveness of cefuroxime axetil tablets in the treatment of acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis due to these 2 organisms.

This study enrolled 317 adult patients, 132 patients in the United States and 185 patients in South America. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to cefuroxime axetil 250 mg twice daily or an oral antimicrobial agent that contained a specific beta­lactamase inhibitor. An intent-to-treat analysis of the submitted clinical data yielded the following results:

 

 

 

In this trial and in a supporting maxillary puncture trial, 15 evaluable patients had non-beta-lactamase–producing Haemophilus influenzae as the identified pathogen. Ten (10) of these 15 patients (67%) had their pathogen (non-beta-lactamase–producing Haemophilus influenzae) eradicated. Eighteen (18) evaluable patients had Streptococcus pneumoniae as the identified pathogen. Fifteen (15) of these 18 patients (83%) had their pathogen (Streptococcus pneumoniae) eradicated.

Safety: The incidence of drug-related gastrointestinal adverse events was statis­tically significantly higher in the control arm (an oral antimicrobial agent that contained a specific beta-lactamase inhibitor) versus the cefuroxime axetil arm (12% versus 1%, respectively; P<.001), particularly drug-related diarrhea (8% versus 1%, respec­tively; P = .001).

Early Lyme Disease: Two adequate and well-controlled studies were performed in patients with early Lyme disease. In these studies all patients had to present with physician-documented erythema migrans, with or without systemic manifestations of infection. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to a 20-day course of treatment with cefuroxime axetil 500 mg twice daily or doxycycline 100 mg 3 times daily. Patients were assessed at 1 month posttreatment for success in treating early Lyme disease (Part I) and at 1 year posttreatment for success in preventing the progression to the sequelae of late Lyme disease (Part II).

A total of 355 adult patients (181 treated with cefuroxime axetil and 174 treated with doxycycline) were enrolled in the 2 studies. In order to objectively validate the clinical diagnosis of early Lyme disease in these patients, 2 approaches were used: 1) blinded expert reading of photographs, when available, of the pretreatment erythema migrans skin lesion; and 2) serologic confirmation (using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA] and immunoblot assay [“Western” blot]) of the presence of antibodies specific to Borrelia burgdorferi, the etiologic agent of Lyme disease. By these procedures, it was possible to confirm the physician diagnosis of early Lyme disease in 281 (79%) of the 355 study patients. The efficacy data summarized below are specific to this “validated” patient subset, while the safety data summarized below reflect the entire patient population for the 2 studies.

Analysis of the submitted clinical data for evaluable patients in the “validated” patient subset yielded the following results:

 

 

Safety: Drug-related adverse events affecting the skin were reported significantly more frequently by patients treated with doxycycline than by patients treated with cefuroxime axetil (12% versus 3%, respectively; P = .002), primarily reflecting the statistically significantly higher incidence of drug-related photosensitivity reactions in the doxycycline arm versus the cefuroxime axetil arm (9% versus 0%, respectively; P<.001). While the incidence of drug-related gastrointestinal adverse events was similar in the 2 treatment groups (cefuroxime axetil - 13%; doxycycline - 11%), the incidence of drug-related diarrhea was statistically significantly higher in the cefurox­ime axetil arm versus the doxycycline arm (11% versus 3%, respectively; P = .005).

Secondary Bacterial Infections of Acute Bronchitis: Four randomized, controlled clinical studies were performed comparing 5 days versus 10 days of cefuroxime axetil for the treatment of patients with secondary bacterial infections of acute bronchitis. These studies enrolled a total of 1,253 patients (CAE-516 n = 360; CAE-517 n = 177; CAEA4001 n = 362; CAEA4002 n = 354). The protocols for CAE-516 and CAE-517 were identical and compared cefuroxime axetil 250 mg twice daily for 5 days, cefuroxime axetil 250 mg twice daily for 10 days, and AUGMENTIN® 500 mg 3 times daily for 10 days. These 2 studies were conducted simultaneously. CAEA4001 and CAEA4002 compared cefuroxime axetil 250 mg twice daily for 5 days, cefuroxime axetil 250 mg twice daily for 10 days, and CECLOR® 250 mg 3 times daily for 10 days. They were otherwise identical to CAE-516 and CAE-517 and were conducted over the following 2 years. Patients were required to have polymorphonuclear cells present on the Gram stain of their screening sputum specimen, but isolation of a bacterial pathogen from the sputum culture was not required for inclusion. The following table demonstrates the results of the clinical outcome analysis of the pooled studies CAE-516/CAE-517 and CAEA4001/CAEA4002, respectively:

 

 

Clinical success (cure + improvement) 65%53%77%74%
Clinical cure 53%44%72%64%
Clinical improvement 12%9%5%10%
Satisfactoryclinical outcome§91%93%84%87%
Clinical cure/success72%73%73%73%
Clinical improvement19%19%10%13%
Clinical success(cure + improvement)80%87%84%82%
Clinical cure 61%70%73%72%
Clinical improvement 19%17%11%10%

REFERENCES

Alkem Laboratories LimitedALKEM HOUSE, Lower Parel,Mumbai  – 400 013, INDIA

  • National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically. 3rd ed. Approved Standard NCCLS Document M7 -A3, Vol. 13, No. 25. Villanova, Pa: NCCLS; 1993.
  • National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests. 4th ed. Approved Standard NCCLS Document M2-A4, Vol. 10, No. 7. Villanova, Pa: NCCLS; 1990.